Ver / Descargar
PDF (Português (Portugal))
Epub (Português (Portugal))
MP3
Cómo citar
Hishiyama J., & Gonzales Taco P. W. (2021). Medidas de Accesibilidad a Oportunidades en Estudios Urbanos. Procesos Urbanos, 8(1), e514. https://doi.org/10.21892/2422085X.514
Formatos de citación
Resumen
Este estudio tiene como objetivo identificar los enfoques para medir la accesibilidad, sus indicadores y los principales temas de aplicación en el uso del suelo y los sistemas de transporte. Mediante un método híbrido de revisión sistemática de la literatura y análisis bibliométrico de redes de acoplamiento bibliográfico, se seleccionaron 54 publicaciones y se identificaron 7 temas de aplicación (transporte público, sistemas de transporte, planificación urbana, uso del suelo, entorno construido, análisis económico y nuevas tecnologías). Se verificó la versatilidad de las medidas de accesibilidad en los estudios urbanos y hubo una mayor oportunidad de contribución científica en temas emergentes relacionados con las nuevas tecnologías y sus implicaciones para la planificación urbana y del transporte.
Palabras clave:
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista Procesos Urbanos está distribuido bajo la Licencia:
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
Acheampong, R. A., & Silva, E. A. (2015). Land use–transport interaction modeling: A review of the literature and future research directions. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(3), 11–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.806
Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
Cao, K., Batty, M., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Yu, L., & Chen, J. (2011). Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: Extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(12), 1949–1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.570269
Cao, K., Huang, B., Wang, S., & Lin, H. (2012). Sustainable land use optimization using Boundary-based Fast Genetic Algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 257–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.001
Cerin, E., Leslie, E., Toit, L. du, Owen, N., & Frank, L. D. (2007). Destinations that matter: Associations with walking for transport. Health and Place, 13(3), 713–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002
Coombes, E., Jones, A. P., & Hillsdon, M. (2010). The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social Science and Medicine, 70(6), 816–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.020
Currie, G. (2010). Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.002
Di, Z., Yang, L., Qi, J., & Gao, Z. (2018). Transportation network design for maximizing flow-based accessibility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 110, 209–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.013
Geurs, K., & Ritsema van Eck, J. R. (2001). Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM. Urban Research Centre, Utrecht University.
Geurs, K., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
Gutiérrez, J. (2001). Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4), 229–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5
Hamidi, S., & Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.021
Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
Hansen, W. G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Planning Association, 25(2), 73–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
Kii, M., Nakanishi, H., Nakamura, K., & Doi, K. (2016). Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction. Transport Policy, 49, 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.015
Kitamura, R., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Impacts of travel-based multitasking on mode choice and value of time View project Travel satisfaction View project. Transportation, 24, 125–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017959825565
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. In EBSE: Vol. 2.3.
Murray, A. T., Davis, R., Stimson, R. J., & Ferreira, L. (1998). Public transportation access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(5), 319–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00010-8
Najmi, A., Rashidi, T. H., Abbasi, A., & Travis Waller, S. (2017). Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 843–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2171-3
Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
Sousa, F. F. L. de M., Loureiro, C. F. G., & Lopes, A. S. (2017). Representação do fenômeno urbano por meio de modelos integrados dos transportes e uso do solo: revisão da literatura e discussão conceitual. Transportes, 25(4), 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1319
Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2019). Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 74(129), 62–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
Verburg, P. H., Ritsema van Eck, J. R., de Nijs, T. C. M., Dijst, M. J., & Schot, P. (2004). Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(1), 125–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b307
Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950118878
Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
Cao, K., Batty, M., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Yu, L., & Chen, J. (2011). Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: Extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(12), 1949–1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.570269
Cao, K., Huang, B., Wang, S., & Lin, H. (2012). Sustainable land use optimization using Boundary-based Fast Genetic Algorithm. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 257–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.08.001
Cerin, E., Leslie, E., Toit, L. du, Owen, N., & Frank, L. D. (2007). Destinations that matter: Associations with walking for transport. Health and Place, 13(3), 713–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.11.002
Coombes, E., Jones, A. P., & Hillsdon, M. (2010). The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social Science and Medicine, 70(6), 816–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.020
Currie, G. (2010). Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.002
Di, Z., Yang, L., Qi, J., & Gao, Z. (2018). Transportation network design for maximizing flow-based accessibility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 110, 209–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.013
Geurs, K., & Ritsema van Eck, J. R. (2001). Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM. Urban Research Centre, Utrecht University.
Geurs, K., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
Gutiérrez, J. (2001). Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: An analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4), 229–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5
Hamidi, S., & Ewing, R. (2014). A longitudinal study of changes in urban sprawl between 2000 and 2010 in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 128, 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.021
Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175
Hansen, W. G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Planning Association, 25(2), 73–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
Kii, M., Nakanishi, H., Nakamura, K., & Doi, K. (2016). Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction. Transport Policy, 49, 148–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.015
Kitamura, R., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Impacts of travel-based multitasking on mode choice and value of time View project Travel satisfaction View project. Transportation, 24, 125–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017959825565
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. In EBSE: Vol. 2.3.
Murray, A. T., Davis, R., Stimson, R. J., & Ferreira, L. (1998). Public transportation access. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(5), 319–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00010-8
Najmi, A., Rashidi, T. H., Abbasi, A., & Travis Waller, S. (2017). Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 843–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2171-3
Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
Sousa, F. F. L. de M., Loureiro, C. F. G., & Lopes, A. S. (2017). Representação do fenômeno urbano por meio de modelos integrados dos transportes e uso do solo: revisão da literatura e discussão conceitual. Transportes, 25(4), 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1319
Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2019). Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 74(129), 62–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
Verburg, P. H., Ritsema van Eck, J. R., de Nijs, T. C. M., Dijst, M. J., & Schot, P. (2004). Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(1), 125–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b307
Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1999). Accessibility and economic development in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(1), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950118878
